UK Financial Reporting Council consults on non-financial reporting

by Carol A Adams

The UK’s Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has responded to the incorporation of the EU Directive on non-financial information into the UK Companies Act by amending its guidance on the Strategic Report.  UK companies with more than 500 employees are required by law to prepare a Strategic Report and now, across the EU, also to report specific non-financial information. This explicitly includes their policies on environmental protection, social responsibility and treatment of employees, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and bribery and diversity on company boards.

The FRC’s Draft amendments to the Guidance on the Strategic Report: Non-financial reporting enhance the link between section 172 of the UK Companies Act with respect to Directors’ responsibilities to promote the success of a company and the purpose of a strategic report. This is good news – research demonstrates that when Boards are involved in the development of corporate reports that both take a long-term focus and recognise that value is more than profit they are cognisant of a wider range of risks and opportunities.  They then set strategy accordingly.

The FRC’s intention is that the guidance reflects key developments in corporate reporting.  Indeed, the proposed guidance has clear synergies with other Frameworks, particularly the Task Force on Climate related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) and the International <IR> Framework, but unfortunately does not make this explicit. There are also synergies with the work of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (for example, with respect to the encouraging the identification of major stakeholders – something the GRI Standards tell reporters how to do).   But without an explicit reference to such standards/frameworks/guidelines the FRC misses an opportunity to provide a really valuable resource for reporters.  These supporting standards and frameworks could be either explicitly referred to or an appendix could be included which draws out where use of such globally recognised frameworks will further enhance the strategic report.

Of course, these other standards/frameworks/guidelines also do not reference each others’ work, but there’s an opportunity for the FRC to lead by example here.

Companies and key global standard setters are providing guidance to companies on responding to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  The SDGs are a key development in reporting that the FRC’s proposed guidance is silent about.  Yet it does discuss the need to disclose external environmental issues which post a risk to the company’s ability to create value over the long term.  This would be an appropriate place to make explicit reference to the existence of sustainable development issues.

Refreshingly the proposed guidance notes that creating value for shareholders requires developing relationships with stakeholders, but the existence of this link is not consistent with the discussion of stakeholders v shareholders elsewhere.

Whilst there is much that is similar in the proposed guidance to the International <IR> Framework (long-term focus, broader view of value, connectivity, business models), multiple capitals are referred to as ‘sources of value’.  Can’t we stick to one term rather than introduce another new one that people don’t understand?

The thinking on materiality is inconsistent and underdeveloped.  The proposed guidance states (para 5.6): “In the context of qualitative information in general and non-financial information in particular, however, a numerical materiality figure is of less importance and a separate assessment may be required.” It is hard to see (at least without further explanation) how a numerical materiality figure is ever relevant in the case of qualitative information and a different type of assessment is most definitely required!

Further there are inconsistencies in definition. Para 4.2 appropriately recognises that creating value for shareholders requires developing relationships with stakeholders. Therefore issues which are material for stakeholders can become material for shareholders. The definition of materiality should reflect this.

Finally there is a tendency for annual reports to ignore climate change (KPMG, 2017) despite its significant financial implications ,so the guidance could emphasise it.

Nevertheless, the draft guidance is progress towards better, more comprehensive corporate reporting.

Cbus Annual Integrated Report 2017 and the SDGs

by Carol A Adams The Cbus Annual Integrated Report 2017 articulates how the pension fund contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) acknowledging the important role of long term investors.  The report identifies six SDGs which Cbus … [Continue reading]

New approach for businesses seeking to contribute to the SDGs

by Carol A Adams My report outlining a new approach supporting businesses looking to contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has been published today by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and … [Continue reading]

Just released: the IIRC’s 2016 Integrated Report – a review

By Carol A Adams The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) has today released its 2016 Integrated Report.  A little late in the year perhaps but it makes up for it in other ways. Right at the beginning the report covers two issues … [Continue reading]

Narrative reporting for financial reports – risk and governance

This second post on narrative reporting for financial reports, focuses on contemporary discussions on: Risk reporting (market, credit, liquidity and estimation risks) Governance reporting Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Risk … [Continue reading]

Contemporary issues in narrative reporting for financial reports – the business model

by Carol A Adams There are some interesting contemporary debates in narrative or non-financial reporting.  As ICAS notes  that the term non-financial reporting refers to information which is included in those parts of corporate reports outside the … [Continue reading]

Sustainability Accounting, Management & Policy Jnl accepted into SSCI (Social Science Citation Index)

by Carol A Adams, Founding Editor and Editor-in-Chief Thanks to the Editorial Team, authors, reviewers and the publisher, Emerald, the Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (SAMPJ) has been accepted into SSCI (Social Science … [Continue reading]

Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process

By Carol A. Adams The purpose of this paper is to examine and explain the complex interrelationships which influence the ability of firms to create value for their providers of finance and other stakeholders (loosely referred to in practice as … [Continue reading]

Five steps to aligning the SDGs with the Integrated Reporting Framework

By Carol A Adams The <IR> Framework provides an opportunity for organisations seeking to respond to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to get Board level attention for integrating them into strategy and reporting. This article … [Continue reading]

The TCFD recommendations: a missed opportunity for harmonisation?

by Carol A Adams The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (hereafter Task Force) was established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body that monitors the global financial system. Chaired by Michael Bloomberg … [Continue reading]